22 May
2010
22 May
'10
9:12 p.m.
On 21/05/2010 21:50, vtl@scls.lib.wi.us wrote:
Thanks Liz and Lori. This confirms what I suspected--we will need development work done.
I've wondered about NCIP. The problem is that we are on a tight deadline for go live and since the SIP2 protocol is necessary for self check is in place, I would be hesitant to start over with NCIP, unless they could mix and match? But it does seem a shame to put more development dollars into SIP2 if we should really be moving toward NCIP.
If you want sip functionality go for sip. Ncip is a different beast (and has more of an existence as a proposed standard than usable implementations a situation that has persisted for years). Colin