LEK is more recently Koha based which should make integration of LEK into Koha fairly easy at the present time.
...although that is purely speculation at this point. LibLime has not responded to my questions about database changes in their version.
LibLime obviously wants the association with the Koha name and that at least should be used as an inducement for them to participate in the community.
Unfortunately I think LibLime wants the association with the Koha name because it lends them a credibility they are rapidly losing on other fronts.
I have always thought that the English demonstration should have been hosted on the community website without any subtle advertising. Failing to correct the issue in the past has become a small problem for the image of Koha as free software which is not dependent upon any particular company.
This is easy enough to say, but as you can see from the difficulty in setting up a Koha Foundation, harder to accomplish in reality. Who would have hosted this community website? Who would have owned the domain name? There wasn't, and still isn't, any entity which could have accomplished this. What I'm asking of LibLime is something that they would ask of any other Koha support company: Don't advertise a proprietary version on the community site. Does anyone believe LibLime would have allowed other companies to even post *news* about their own proprietary versions of Koha? -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org