I should clarify: I wouldn't strip out the 001 or 003 from a record--I was referring mostly to call numbers, possibly physical description, maybe subject headings--things you need to add to a record. I do very little original cataloging; most of my records I download from OCLC. A lot of the NLM call numbers are either incomplete or missing entirely. For those, I go to the NLM classification site (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/class//) and try to come as close as I can. For the Cutter number, I look in my Cutter-Sanborn Three-Figure Author book or to http://www.unforbi.com.ar/cutteren/. For the handful of books for which I create an entire record, well, I do the best I can. I used to worry about getting it exactly right, but now I figure that if it's off a bit, it doesn't matter.
*And yes, someday I'm going to move the catalog from the MS Access 97 database to Koha. Then please use Koha as a recognizable library catalogue rather than a glorified spreadsheet. But YMMV.
But of course. That's why I haven't done it yet--I want to get it right. :-) And we're still unpacking from the move. Fred King Medical Librarian, MedStar Washington Hospital Center fred.king@medstar.net 202-877-6670 ORCID 0000-0001-5266-0279 MedStar Authors Catalog: http://medstarauthors.org I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it. --Terry Pratchett -----Original Message----- From: Koha [mailto:koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Paul A Sent: Monday, August 06, 2018 10:25 AM To: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Subject: Re: [Koha] Field 003 of Marc21 ** ATTENTION: This email originated from outside of the MedStar network.** DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 2018-08-06 09:26 AM, King, Fred wrote:
Real catalogers are going to turn pale and have to sit down when they read this
IT technicians (and lawyers) might also turn pale. The combination of 001 and 003 should be unique, and show the origin (certainly as a courtesy, if not as the responsibility and the possible copyright of a z39-50 download) of what you are using in your library db. "Your library" might be big, small, at home, whatever; but if you make your records available to the public, surely some level of accountability is desirable. MARC21 (and other flavours used by Koha) have been developed over many years from tradition, some common sense, some technicalities, probably many more considerations by tens of thousands of quite smart librarians, archivists and end-users. Koha makes this available at a fairly painless level.
*And yes, someday I'm going to move the catalog from the MS Access 97 database to Koha. Then please use Koha as a recognizable library catalogue rather than a glorified spreadsheet. But YMMV.
Best -- Paul _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__koha-2Dcommunity.org&d=DwIGaQ&c=RvBXVp2Kc-itN3g6r3sN0QK_zL4whPpndVxj8-bJ04M&r=vKh6XwOmjyC51IkP1OfsdjQZoWT2vpi6VZl8El8EPRI&m=2FkOP1yOWfqOYFyeieTkQmrZymuGvocpxV3Ke01uPvk&s=0qjXjCIFwlGG5WkJPARQ_tzr0qdQJLRhvr7Dep1oyF4&e= Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.katipo.co.nz_mailman_listinfo_koha&d=DwIGaQ&c=RvBXVp2Kc-itN3g6r3sN0QK_zL4whPpndVxj8-bJ04M&r=vKh6XwOmjyC51IkP1OfsdjQZoWT2vpi6VZl8El8EPRI&m=2FkOP1yOWfqOYFyeieTkQmrZymuGvocpxV3Ke01uPvk&s=_5uKGvg4zbc5VZv-JdM85vfAkFYU_Pw4KRLbN4xnkT8&e=