They do totally different things. You cant circulate items with greenstone, ,... in fact you couldnt run a library with it at all. Conversely, Koha currently you cant load digital content in, and search over it. Fedora, Kete, Greenstone , lots more are similair Koha, Evergreen, III, Sirsi Dynix's systems, those are similair I think the most similair about Koha and Greenstone is they both have the word library in their by lines :) They really are totally different systems designed to do totally different things. When Koha was first released, quite a few of us Katipods went up to Hamilton to spend some time with the Greenstone developers, there are always things you can learn from each other :) But no, not competing at all Chris On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:50 AM, gsl <gsl@rollinghills.lib.mo.us> wrote:
So if they are complementary and complimentary, are they then completely comparable and compatible?
Greg --------------------------
Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:
Complimentary, Greenstone is a digital library system, Koha is an
Complementary and complimentary, perhaps? :)
Regards,
Galen
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha