I'd prefer location (the library branch) -- I've been asked for that sort myself. It makes more sense in terms of the user, who may want to know which branches have the item. For single-library sites, would the secondary sort still be item type? Jane Wagner Library Systems Analyst PTFS Inc. Content Management and Library Solutions 6400 Goldsboro Road, Suite 200 Bethesda, MD 20817 (301) 654-8088 x 151 jwagner@ptfs.com -----Original Message----- From: koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Owen Leonard Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:22 PM To: Koha List Subject: [Koha] Default sorting on the OPAC's detail page The OPAC's detail page sorts by default on the *first* column in the table which displays the holdings information. If you have item-level item types, that column will be item type: http://acpl.kohalibrary.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=429 31 If not, that column will be Location. Should Location be made the default sort column in either case? -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha