[Koha] Issue with updated_on in borrowers table and LDAP auth
Katrin Fischer
katrin.fischer.83 at web.de
Mon May 13 00:33:21 NZST 2024
Hi,
I see that you have raised a bug now, which is good:
*Bug 36822*
<https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36822> - When
creating a new patron via C4::Auth_with_ldap inserts 0000-00-00 for
invalid updated_on
Katrin
On 04.05.24 00:29, Betka, Corey A wrote:
> Hello,
> I've inherited a really old install of koha (3.18.11) and I'm trying to get it migrated to current stable. I've figured out most of the database upgrade issues along the way thanks to the mailing list archives and old bug entries, but now I've run into something I can't find a solution for.
>
> Relevant versions:
> OS: Ubuntu 22.04
> Koha: 23.11.04-4
> MySQL: 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
>
> Issue:
> When a user is created via LDAP auth to the OPAC, the updated_on field in the borrowers table is set to "0000-00-00 00:00:00" and this makes it fail to display in the Intranet interface, showing a 500 error for that page of Patrons or if you search directly for the patron. If I have the new patron request a change in their record via OPAC and approve it in the Intranet, the updated_on field changes to a current value and then things work as expected. That's obviously not scalable.
>
> We have LDAP auth configured to connect to our campus active directory with the following settings:
> <replicate>1</replicate>
> <update>1</update>
> <auth_by_bind>1</auth_by_bind>
> <mapping>
> <firstname is="givenName" ></firstname>
> <surname is="sn" ></surname>
> <userid is="sAMAccountName" ></userid>
> <email is="mail" ></email>
> <address is="streetAddress" ></address>
> <city is="l" >Champaign, IL</city>
> <privacy is="" >1</privacy>
> <branchcode is="" >TCC</branchcode>
> <categorycode is="" >ST</categorycode>
> </mapping>
>
> I've done some slight modification to the logging in Patron.pm and the values that are being logged for updated_on don't make much sense to me:
> "updated_on" : { "after" : "SCALAR(0x55fff641bca0)", "before" : "2024-05-03 21:59:40" } }
>
> Any suggestions? Is this a side effect of explicit_defaults_for_timestamp changing in MySQL? Does mariadb handle this differently? I had to use mysql to get past some foreign key issues early in the database upgrade scripts, but am open to migrating to mariadb now that the data can be brought forward.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Corey Betka
> Infrastructure Architect
>
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign │ Student Affairs │ Student Affairs Technology
> 330 Clark Hall │ 1203 S 4th St │ M/C 548 │ Champaign, IL 61820
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Koha mailing listhttp://koha-community.org
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> Unsubscribe:https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
More information about the Koha
mailing list