[Koha] Foundation conversation

david at lang.hm david at lang.hm
Sat Oct 16 20:54:44 NZDT 2010


On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, JAMES Mason wrote:

>>>
>>> I like the "it's people -- not companies" scheme myself.
>>
>> Obviously I disagree in at least some limited form.
>>
>> However if people form the anti-PTFS side are unwilling to compromise, I see only two options:
>> 1) Two Kohas with the same name that will only more confuse people and make the issues David Lang mentioned much worse and more wide spread, or
>> 2) The anti-PTFS people finishing the fork of the product and coming up with a new name for there version.
>>
>
>
> Ed, the obvious option you missed was this one...
> 3) The *PTFS* people finishing the fork of their product and coming up with a new name for their version. :)
>
> well... thats already been done!!!  its called LEK :)
>
>
> seriously tho, why would we (read: everyone else in the greater-international-Koha-community) want to abandon our project's name (10 years folks!) because one 'stubbon' company forced us to change our website from A -> B

for the simple reason that they own the name, and trying to browbeat a 
company into changing a name they own may be substantially more work than 
renaming the community version.

> the Koha project continues regardless of what PTFS decides to do in the future

under some name or another, with more or less confusion of what is what, 
and with anyone who gets confused and asks questions about the wrong 
version in the wrong place getting an earful about the other side.

I have no bone in this fight. I have not been offended personally by 
PTFS, and I don't know anyone there or have any business 
relationship with anyone there either.

other FOSS projects that have had the name owned by someone they didn't 
like have changed their name (ethereal/wireshark isa perfect example here)

you may feal that you have the moral right to the name, but the fact is 
that they have been paying for the name, if push comes to shove it 
will be quite a legal fight to get the name forcefully, and that (probably 
lengthy) fight will just serve to further confuse things in the meantime.


The good news (from my outside position) is that not everyone is taking 
such a hard-line approach, so there's still some room for discussions to 
take place

David Lang


> and in other news... congrats to software-coop and bywater!
> http://liswire.com/content/bywater-solutions-and-softwarecoop-collaborating-koha-edi-support
>
> way to collaborate Guys!
>
>
> cheers, Mason
>


More information about the Koha mailing list