[Koha] Licensing on koha-community.org

[Galen Charlton]

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:54 PM, MJ Ray <mjr at phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> 1. much of the other Koha-related materials are under GPL2+, so we
> should license the community website under the same terms, so all
> the explanations and arguments made before still apply and we don't
> have to think about it too much; OR

Licensing under GPL2+ would be my preference for "permanent" content
such as documentation - but see below.

> 2. we consider that stuff on the community website is advertising that
> should be spread as widely as possible, so we put it under a really
> liberal license like No Problem Bugroff, WTFPL, MIT/Expat or anything
> else compatible with GPL2+ (just in case it ends up in Koha itself).

I'd be happy with a more liberal license such MIT for things like the
news and events postings.  Can we do both, or would that be too
confusing?

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
gmcharlt at gmail.com