[Koha] 952$o subfield not displayed in OPAC

Katrin Fischer Katrin.Fischer.83 at web.de
Fri Oct 2 19:30:56 NZDT 2015


Hi Dave,

> DefaultClassificationSource to lcc, as well as the itemcallnumber to
map to
> 050a. And I'm using the default framework in Koha 3.20.02.

Do you mean the system preference itemcallnumber?

That would explain what you see: The pref will not change the mapping,
but will help you when cataloguing by making a suggestion. So every time
you edit the item and it notices that the callnumber field is empty, it
pulls a suggestion from 050a for you - so when you save, 952$o gets
filled and then it works as it should.

I wonder why putting your callnumber in 952$o during import didn't work
- maybe you can retest that or share an example with us to see what was
going wrong there.

Hope this helps,

Katrin

Am 01.10.2015 um 19:55 schrieb dc12345:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I've recently set up a web server running Koha for a small library at a
> research institute, and I'm having issues with the OPAC in displaying the
> itemcallnumber field. I originally converted my holdings from an Excel file
> to .mrc format with MarcEdit and everything else imported perfectly. I am
> using LCC for my call numbers rather than Dewey, and I changed the
> DefaultClassificationSource to lcc, as well as the itemcallnumber to map to
> 050a. And I'm using the default framework in Koha 3.20.02.
> 
> The weird thing is, when I go to edit an individual record as an admin, the
> full call number is there in the 952o subfield, just as it should be. It
> just comes out blank in the OPAC. If I then save the entry without editing
> it, it fixes the issue. I would just edit each book then, but I have 5144
> total books to edit, so there's got to be another way to fix it. Here's an
> example of a MARC record as I originally imported it:
> 
> =LDR  00303nam a2200109Ia 45e0
> =008  150928s9999\\\\xx\\\\\\\\\\\\000\0\und\d
> =050  \\$aF1435.1 .C46
> =100  \\$aRobin, Cynthia
> =245  \\$aEveryday Life Matters: Maya Farmers at Chan
> =260  \\$bUniversity Press of Florida
> =260  \\$c2013
> =952  \\$aMARI$bMARI$p03403$yBKS
> 
> I've also tried adding the 952$o subfield before I import it, but I get the
> same result. By the way, I know my 050 field should be split as
> 050$aF1435.1$b.C46, but I'm an archaeologist and not a librarian (dammit
> Jim!) and didn't realize this when I started this process. But I've also
> imported single books this way and played around with formatting a lot, with
> the same results. 
> 
> Any help would be greatly appreciated! Other than this hiccup, which is
> surely my fault, I've been very impressed with Koha!
> 
> Thanks!
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/952-o-subfield-not-displayed-in-OPAC-tp5855379.html
> Sent from the Koha-general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
> 



More information about the Koha mailing list