[Koha] Journal articles and analytical records
Elaine Bradtke
bradtke.e at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 30 00:27:42 NZDT 2010
Regarding the subfields in 773, I'm using $x ISSN and $z ISBN when we
have this information, plus $o for the accession number of the item. A
lot of what we have doesn't have International Standard numbers for
one reason or another, but it all has an accession number.
I haven't worried too much about the display at the moment, it seemed
to look ok in the test runs.
The one thing I couldn't get to function was a link between the 773
field and the parent item, but we're a bit behind in installing Koha
releases*, and this may work better in the newer ones.
Perhaps we should form a group on analytics and pool our information
and techniques? With an idea of putting together a little wiki?
Thanks
Elaine
(*I work 2 days a week on this project, and my IT guru is a volunteer. . . )
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:15:06 -0500
> From: Linda Culberson <lculber at mdah.state.ms.us>
> Subject: [Koha] Journal articles and analytical records
> To: koha <koha at lists.katipo.co.nz>
> Message-ID: <4BACB35A.6060505 at mdah.state.ms.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> All,
> We are just now loading our records, but have thousands of analytic
> records that we will be experimenting with. Like Elaine and Beda, we are
> looking at using the 773. I was thinking about putting the host item
> system number in the subfield $w and maybe using the subfield $o for
> something to tie directly to the individual item. In our current system
> we are using the item part, and I was thinking of either trying that or
> using the barcode or itemnumber in the $o. What subfields have been used
> in your testing, Elaine?
>
> I am relieved to know we are not alone in looking at this and look
> forward to working with everyone. We have absolutely no funds to
> contribute but sweat equity works, I hope.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Linda
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:50:53 -0400
> From: Jared Camins-Esakov <camins at numismatics.org>
> Subject: Re: [Koha] Journal articles and analytical records
> To: Linda Culberson <lculber at mdah.state.ms.us>
> Cc: koha <koha at lists.katipo.co.nz>
> Message-ID: <4BACC9CD.8050608 at numismatics.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Good morning, list,
>
> I replied off-list to Andrew yesterday, assuming that no one else was
> crazy enough to create analytics, but it looks like I was wrong.
>
> In our database of ~175,000 bibliographic records, we have ~120,000
> analytic records, created over the last 50 years (our card catalog was
> digitized in the 90s). Our old system did not link analytics, but we
> very much want to provide linking in the new Koha catalog. I added
> ISBNs, ISSNs, LCCNs, and local control numbers to ~91,000 of those
> analytic records, but for everything except for the ISBN, that only
> identifies the bibliographic record and not the actual item. We don't
> currently do anything with the links, although it seems like it
> shouldn't be too problematic to add them, at least on a bib record level
> (50 years of catalogers have resulted in exceedingly inconsistent 773$g
> formatting).
>
> It's very good to know that we're not going it alone with regards to
> analytic records in Koha. How are those of you with analytics displaying
> host publication information in the OPAC?
>
> Unfortunately, we probably don't have any money for sponsoring these
> features, either.
>
> Regards,
> Jared
>
--
Elaine
More information about the Koha
mailing list