[Koha] 001 control number

[Jesse Weaver]

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Brian Harrington
<bharrington at muse.jhu.edu>wrote:

>
> I was actually planning on asking a very similar question to John's. Right
> now, all of the calls in Biblio.pm are based on biblionumber.  We're
> currently working in a hybrid situation where I would like to use the Koha
> API get information from records based on our item ID, which I was planning
> on storing in 001, where such things normally go.  The idea of having to
> first search the MARC for my unique ID to get the biblionumber that I need
> for GetBiblio or ModBiblio seems wasteful.  Would it actually break anything
> to map biblionumber to 001?
>
>        -- Brian
>
> --
> Brian Harrington
> Content and Resource Development Coordinator
> Project MUSE
> The Johns Hopkins University Press
> brian at jhu.edu
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Joe Atzberger wrote:
>
>  John --
>>
>> biblionumber is the database's internal table key.  It should not
>> correspond
>> to data from the outside world.
>>
>> --Joe
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:13 PM, John <jdayrutherford at gmail.com> wrote:
>>      I have a new koha 3 installation. I am playing with importing
>>      marc records. I want to match on the 001 field. The default
>>      match field is set as ISBN now.
>>
>>      Do I need to set the biblioitems.biblionumber field to be the
>>      001
>>      field? Is there any relation between biblionumber and the fields
>>      defined in Record Matching Rules?
>>      [IMAGE]
>>
>>      John Rutherford
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
>

Brian,

Is this item id the equivalent of a per-copy barcode or accession number, or
a per biblio identifier?

-- 
Jesse Weaver
Software Developer, LibLime
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.katipo.co.nz/pipermail/koha/attachments/20081203/7b4d32f9/attachment.htm