[Koha] Installation Questions
Chris Cormack
chris at katipo.co.nz
Wed Mar 20 18:42:39 NZST 2002
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 18:32, Roger Buck wrote:
>
> Yep understood - and it does make sense.
>
> But...
>
> As I understand it, by default, apache does not not look for SSI
> commands in *.html because that slows down every access to every HTML
> file.
>
> On the other hand, if most koha *.html files are likely to contain
> includes then that alone would not be significant. OTOH, I'm unsure as
> to how that affects document caching... potential additional performance
> degradation as perceived by end user due to absence of caching?
>
Yeah, Id recommend only turning it on for the koha dirs, since i think
every .html file in there actually has an include call in it.
> I guess the XBitHack option optimises performance (both caching and off
> the server) at the expense of more complex configuration requirement on
> the server admin.
>
>
> As usual, I guess it's a question of trading off ease of configuration
> against performance? But, for either option to work, most users will
> need to change their httpd.conf configuration anyhow - so maybe it's
> just enough to list the pros and cons and let each user make their own
> choice :-)
Good plan.
>
> BTW I noticed one other prob with the includes: Some of the tags are
> malformed:
>
> Instead of this:
> <!--#element attribute=value attribute=value -->
>
>
> there is this:
> <!--#element attribute=value attribute=value>
> -------------------------------------------^^
>
> which results in a "premature EOF"
>
Ahh right, if you can send me a list of the files you spot this in, ill
tidy that up.
>
> I don't want you to get the wrong idea: I really don't know much about
> this stuff - just repeating what I've read in the docs :-)
>
No worries
I appreciate all the work your doing, and Im sure everyone else does as
well
Chris
--
Chris Cormack Programmer
025 500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd
chris at katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz
More information about the Koha
mailing list