Biblio number is only relevant for bibs. What should be used for authorities? That is what I was referring to below but the problem may be common to both objects. -Doug- On Sep 3, 2012 9:49 AM, "Jared Camins-Esakov" <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> wrote:
Doug,
I would concur that 001 and 003 need to be taken together to have any
chance of a unique identifier. Our library has our own unique 003 (UkLoVW). For indexing, I suspect a better key to hand to zebra would be the system control number (035 $a). Are these kept unique by koha?
We already have a unique identifier, the biblionumber. It's stored in 999$c. The bug in this case is that the DOM indexing uses the contents in 001 if you have it populated.
While I do believe this is a problem, I am not sure how this would the cause of our ModAuthority failures however, unless I am missing something. See the other mail thread for details (3.8.4 Error message when editing authorities). Its possible these issues are related but I am not sure.
The ZOOM error you reported might have something to do with this, but I just don't know. I don't think I've ever seen problems with ZOOM element (as opposed to attribute) before.
Regards, Jared
-- Jared Camins-Esakov Bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 (e-mail) jcamins@cpbibliography.com (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/