I've misunderstood the question. First of all you should have clear what you're looking for, the desired features. Then you make a comparison chart with the packages you may find more suitables, and take into account an estimation of the cost of making them work in the way you're expecting. And you make a decison. Hope this helps H S Rai wrote:
Today at 7:45am -0300 Andrés Tarallo wrote:
Koha is free software, you won't pay FOR THE SOFTWARE, but you might (or maybe not) pay FOR SERVICES in order to have it working to your wishes.
<snip>
Library wrote:
Can anybody tell me what is the estimated cost(worth us$) of Koha2.0.1 .
I guess the query was about worth in term of money (US$) and not about cost. There may be similar proprietary software costing $2000, but still having feaures less than Koha. Koha may be free (cost wise) but feature wise it may have worth of $4000.
So, some comparison of this sort (cost to benefit ratio, total cost of ownership etc), which may help potential user or decision maker to take infomed decision and not be misguided by marketing executive of proprietary software