--- On Fri, 10/15/10, Reed Wade <reedwade@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Reed Wade <reedwade@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Koha] Foundation conversation To: Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Date: Friday, October 15, 2010, 10:21 PM 2010/10/16 ed c <terrapin44@yahoo.com>
My proposal is that PTFS and HLT each would get an
equal number (3) of slots to appoint people as they see first for three years. The community would also get to vote for slots. These "appointed" slots would decrease by one each year until there was no appointed slots.
How does "I bought a company that holds a DNS name the community used to care about"
If they only "used to care about" it why do people keep complaining about what Liblime puts there?
rate any kind of additional voice or control?
I like the "it's people -- not companies" scheme myself.
Obviously I disagree in at least some limited form. However if people form the anti-PTFS side are unwilling to compromise, I see only two options: 1) Two Kohas with the same name that will only more confuse people and make the issues David Lang mentioned much worse and more wide spread, or 2) The anti-PTFS people finishing the fork of the product and coming up with a new name for there version. Edward
-reed _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha