I'm going to put in a ME Too to agree with Eric. The new site is lovely. However, the site really needs to be vendor independent or small libraries are going to turn away under the impression that they need to use a vendor to install and use the software. As for contributions, I think Eric is correct that contributions by a paid company should be attributed to the people who actually paid for them. Perhaps something that states the contribution was paid for by ... and programming/development by ... One quick CSS fix...the documentation link in the top tabs overruns the right hand line. Thanx. Lenora StreamNet Regional Librarian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission http://www.fishlib.org
Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> 5/8/2009 2:21 PM >>> 2009/5/9 Eric Bégin <Eric.Begin@inlibro.com>: Hi,
First, I want to raise my hat to LibLime team for the new website.
Yes me too.
I also want to thanks Thomas for the time he spent to analyse the new
site
and for bringing those worth to discuss points.
Definitely, also I would like to thank you and MJ for your input also.
Here is, briefly, my comments.
My main point here is that the Koha.org website should be as vendor-independant as possible. I really think that the Alphabetical order is the best way to reach that goal.
I agree it should be vendor independent. And I also agree with the suggestion to have a separate page detailing contributions. Chris _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha