Ben Ide wrote: [...replying to the idea that Josh should post...]
To what advantage? Why should he send another missive here when all have been content to ignore the previous ones?
Ah yes, the top one of which is the LibLime Enterprise Koha Q&A which includes both that "LibLime Enterprise Koha is not a 'fork' of Koha" and "Our new approach moves the contribution phase of development to the end of the cycle" - that's to say, it's a fork until it's finished. When the message contradicts itself like that, anyone who picks either part can be accused of ignoring it! So no-one who discusses LL at all can win at the moment...
Perhaps you could request this of Josh or encourage the individual at your organization who is responsible for your relationship to LL to request it of Josh?
Again, what on earth would be the advantage of that? To me, it just seems like a waste of a busy person's time.
It depends how much one values the community. Last year, about a third of the co-op's time was spent on community participation. It benefits both our workers and our customers to have good communities. I hope the climate here will improve, with less firey emails soon. I can understand the frustration, but I know from experience that "what on earth" questions don't get good answers. I hope LibLime's customers can encourage to get involved or sell the community assets to a vendor-neutral community org. Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef) LMS developer and webmaster at | software www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op