On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 COURYHOUSE@aol.com wrote:
To put things in perspective, even before Pate joined this endeavor I had mentioned both LC and MARC with the folks at Katipo Communications. As well as Steve T. When Pate came on board I discussed LC as well as MARC with him as well. I was told this evening by someone from the project I should have submitted it as a bug report. It is just a little weird I feel I am being put in a position of defending myself?
Sorry for making you feel as though you're on the defensive. I'm feeling a bit that way myself as we're getting closer to 2.0 ... I know that LC numbers have been kicked around for a while and not much has happened so far. Right now, it's not going to make it into 2.0.0 ... I think it will probably be in 2.0.1. I'll go submit a bug report/feature request right now to ensure it doesn't slide of our collective plate again. -pate
The request for LC was not a new one. it may seem so to some of the folk now as many of you were not even here when it was being made!
Thanks Ed Sharpe, Archivist for SMECC
See the Museum's Web Site at
www.smecc.org
We are always looking for items to add to the museum's display and ref. library please advise if you have anything we can use.
mail:
Coury House / SMECC 5802 W. Palmaire Ave. Glendale Az 85301 USA
623-435-1522
Subj:Re: [Koha-devel] Re: [Koha] 3rd pre 2.0 meeting (fwd) Date:6/18/2003 6:04:34 PM US Mountain Standard Time From:<A HREF="mailto:pate@eylerfamily.org">pate@eylerfamily.org</A> To:<A HREF="mailto:koha@lists.katipo.co.nz">koha@lists.katipo.co.nz</A>, <A HREF="mailto:koha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net">koha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net</A> Sent from the Internet
hmm, this was really meant for the list at large, not just Ed.
sorry, -pate
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 20:21:56 -0400 (EDT)