Hi Steve
Rosalie, you mentioned "trimming" the MARC records in the past. Just out of curiousity, what part of the records do you trim, and why?
I remember things like "A Large Print Book" appearing as a field, which is superfluous, because our item type tells us it's a large print book. And subject headings such as "Swine - Juvenile Literature" for The Three Little Pigs. And incredibly detailed descriptions of the type and number of illustrations, and the names (authority controlled!) of additional authors, translators, editors et al. My lack of tolerance for extraneous information was probably shaped by the years with a 386 server with 200Mb of hard disk - and no upgrade in view. It did make us focus on the essentials. We use maybe 30 fields maximum to describe any item in our library to the level of detail required by my community. MARC records have 999 - so there is lots of room for trimming. Cataloguers have a passion for accuracy. This Public librarian has a passion for getting the books in front of the people as fast as possible. Given that more than 90% of my users choose by browsing rather than by searching the catalogue, I don't think time and money spent on overdetailed cataloguing records is justified. "Quick and dirty" is not an insult in my library. Rosalie _____________________________________________
Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha