On 11 May 2010 10:13, Lars Wirzenius <lars@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
On ti, 2010-05-11 at 05:30 +1200, Chris Cormack wrote:
If we can't do that, I vote for pulling the listing from the website, and just using the wiki where people can have edit wars to their hearts content.
I suspect a listing in the wiki would be most in the community spirit anyway. However, I think a more important point in this discussion is that there's a perceived need to do "quality control" on the Koha vendors.
Would it be better to do that via feedback from customers rather than pre-approval by the community? In other words, have a list of all Koha vendors, and then a mechanism via which their customers can give feedback on how satisfied they are. This could be a mailing list, a wiki page, or a, say, a yearly survey sent out to Koha users.
Ooohh I like it :) +1 from me Chris