Hi, unfortunately the problem is a bit more complicated. :( I think since our switch from grs-1 to dom indexing, the kw index includes the whole record, where before that switch it was 'everything that is indexed'. So changing the configuration of individual fields/indexes won't make a difference. See: *Bug 15050* <https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15050> - Nonpublic note searchable from OPAC I am not sure if this is solved already with Elasticsearch. Some things you could do to avoid issues is linking 952$e to a vendor record using the id. I've been thinking it would be nice if we had a value builder to do this for a while. If you add items from acquisition it will also fill source of acquisition with the id, so that would make things more consistent. For internal notes I think a good rule of thumb would be to avoid using personal names whenever possible. For some use cases internally agreed on codes or the cardnumber might work. Having a separate feature for adding notes that don't end up in the MARC records (and possible exports, OAI etc.) might be a good idea anyway. Hope this helps Katrin On 06.10.21 13:04, Owen Leonard wrote:
(e. g. MARC 952$e the source of acquisition, or MARC 952$x the non-public note) If these are indexed by default I think that should be considered a bug.
-- Owen