On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 18:32, Roger Buck wrote:
Yep understood - and it does make sense.
But...
As I understand it, by default, apache does not not look for SSI commands in *.html because that slows down every access to every HTML file.
On the other hand, if most koha *.html files are likely to contain includes then that alone would not be significant. OTOH, I'm unsure as to how that affects document caching... potential additional performance degradation as perceived by end user due to absence of caching?
Yeah, Id recommend only turning it on for the koha dirs, since i think every .html file in there actually has an include call in it.
I guess the XBitHack option optimises performance (both caching and off the server) at the expense of more complex configuration requirement on the server admin.
As usual, I guess it's a question of trading off ease of configuration against performance? But, for either option to work, most users will need to change their httpd.conf configuration anyhow - so maybe it's just enough to list the pros and cons and let each user make their own choice :-)
Good plan.
BTW I noticed one other prob with the includes: Some of the tags are malformed:
Instead of this: <!--#element attribute=value attribute=value -->
there is this: <!--#element attribute=value attribute=value> -------------------------------------------^^
which results in a "premature EOF"
Ahh right, if you can send me a list of the files you spot this in, ill tidy that up.
I don't want you to get the wrong idea: I really don't know much about this stuff - just repeating what I've read in the docs :-)
No worries I appreciate all the work your doing, and Im sure everyone else does as well Chris -- Chris Cormack Programmer 025 500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd chris@katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz