Maybe then in that case in order to no confuse first time visitors you need to put that the three people hired in that grandfathering have all since left liblime.
Please don't re-write history.
What? So I do still work for liblime? I didn't resign? Wow, i guess im owed a pile of backpay then. I'm not sure what you mean here, it's totally accurate that neither Russel, Mason or I work for liblime, and havent since april last year.
the koha-manage group decided to...
What are the factor making for someone to be in the Koha-manage group? There is no mention of such a group on koha.org.
My main point here is that the Koha.org website should be as vendor-independant as possible. I really think that the Alphabetical order is the best way to reach that goal.
I respectfully disagree. Listing by date joined is the most vendor-independent and community-focused. Another fair option would be to list in order of contributions, most to least. This community is, after all, a meritocracy :).
The community is what the community decides it should be.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean, Chris, could you explain? Do you mean to imply that the Koha community is not a meritocracy? Koha, like the Apache community has always represented 'Meritocracy in Action!' from my POV.
I mean that no one person gets to decide what this community does, or how it decides things. Chris