Cab, That is correct. All/All is your default. If there isn't a different rule for a more specific set of criteria, then it will fall to that rule. It has been suggested to have an All/All rule for each library, but I find that to be redundant as well, and makes the All/All rule for all libraries pointless. ___________________________ Christopher Brannon IT Coordinator Coeur d'Alene Public Library 702 E Front Ave Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 (208)769-2315 Ext. 456 cbrannon@cdalibrary.org www.cdalibrary.org Message: 5 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:18:46 -0500 From: Cab Vinton <bibliwho@gmail.com> To: Koha list <koha@lists.katipo.co.nz> Subject: [Koha] Circulation/ fines rules Message-ID: <CABW43USW60m9Rqq0sCDteuaS=i8r_3Bb4rbXkDaqTCOU5uJUaA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 With a 3-branch library system & the following rules, am I right in assuming that rows 2 thru 4 are redundant & can be safely deleted? (Settings for all four rows are identical.) Library Patron category Item type Loan period Unit Fine amount Fine charging interval Overdue fines cap (amount) Renewals allowed (count) Renewal period Holds allowed (count) ALL All All 21 days 0.10 1 10 2 21 999 KIMBALL All All 21 days 0.10 1 10 2 21 999 PLAISTOW All All 21 days 0.10 1 10 2 21 999 SANDOWN All All 21 days 0.10 1 10 2 21 999 Thank you, Cab Vinton, Director Plaistow Public Library Plaistow, NH