We will get a new server for our Koha-installation. I was wondering, how important some things might be. I don't want to know what is essential to run Koha but what would be beneficial if available and what does not matter at all.
Our installation now feels really slow and I hope to change that before we go live with all features. We will have around 40.000 biblios in the DB.
I was thinking of a multicore CPU (probably quadcore) so we can run Zebra updates, local scripts and other things frequently and not interrupt regular use of OPAC and staff client. Does that make sense?
I would definitely recommend multi-core. I personally feel that some of the AMD processors offer better cost-value with excellent performance
Does Koha work well on 64bit Debian? Are the Debian packages available for 64bit?
Does it make sense to have more than 2 or 3GB of RAM for Koha performance? In that case we would need a 64bit system. I'm under the impression that a lot of the "database stuff" happens in RAM, is that right?
More is better. Most 32 bit Linux distros will run quite happily on 64-bit CPUs and whatever RAM, but above 4GB RAM and with a 64-bit CPU, yes, you should consider a 64 bit OS. Would the use of an SSD instead of a regular hard disk be favourable (if the price does not matter)? Does it affect Koha performance? IMHO SSD is still too expensive to be cost effective. Are there other things worth considering regaring server hardware?
Always consider future needs. Even if you can't afford, or think you
Just a bit of my personal philosophy here, but I realize that in a
On 09/09/2011 04:30 AM, Mirko wrote: than Intel CPUs, but that's just my opinion. Either are great. AMD has some very good 6- and 8-core processors that are readily available at good prices too (speaking for the US anyway). We have two 6-core HP servers here that we got at very good prices (but of course, I didn't purchase them with MS licenses). possibly need 6 or 8 or 12 GB of memory, consider the advantages of more memory slots, even if you can't max those out initially. public service organization it is rarely the case that I purchase equipment like a server, use it for a given number of years, and then throw it out and buy a new one. Typically when I remove a computer from service now I have to re-purpose it for some lower task that I have. That's why I try, as much as possible, to buy equipment that will let me do something to keep using it four or five years later. Some of those considerations are just what I've mentioned above--multi-core CPUs and plenty of memory slots. I would imagine that a server with 2, 6-core CPUs and maybe 12 GB of memory purchased now would still be a great virtual machine host in 2016.
With specific regard to hard drives, enterprise class drives are great. I wish I could afford them for everything.
Link: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=30 Obviously they are also expensive. For many of my important needs where I can't justify the cost of server-grade hard drives I've found that the Western Digital Caviar Black drives do very well--I usually put two of those in a Raid 1 array. That gives good service at an easier cost and the Raid 1 still gives some good reliability. The "Black" drives are the top of WD's Caviar color line, which includes "Green" and "Blue". http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=100 Server examples (US) (w/o drives): 8 core, 4GB: http://www.govconnection.com/IPA/Shop/Product/Detail.htm?sku=11258779&cac=Result 6 core, very similar to our server: http://www.govconnection.com/IPA/Shop/Product/Detail.htm?sku=10181888&cac=Result
Disclaimer: I have no vested interest in any of the companies listed above.
Thank you in advance,
Mirko _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
-- Greg Lawson Rolling Hills Consolidated Library 1912 N. Belt Highway St. Joseph, MO 64506