Hi, 2010/5/10 Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>:
Or (better yet) simply ensuring that all such modified code is immediately contributed to the main code base would also seem to satisfy this requirement.
No, it wouldn't - not all contributions would (or should) get accepted into Koha's main line, and a series of patch messages in the koha-patches archives does not constitute a "standard" means of sharing software IMO. If Koha becomes licensed under the APGL3, a hosting firm would be entirely entitled to simply set up an FTP server that supplies tarballs of their customized versions of Koha. While publishing a public Git repository would be a better way of sharing such code, we can't mandate it or require that contributions be sent back to the project. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt@gmail.com