On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
Do you think there would be consideration from the devs for this problem, that is the ability to serve koha on URL prefixes ?
The current scheme makes it a bit inconvenient to integrate koha on existing infrastructures and I rather not get too much into the ugh workarounds, it’s annoying for everyone when we run into bugs.
I agree!
Should I perhaps open an issue about this ?
That might be a good idea. Here are two threads from last year where I had similar problems: https://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2022-April/047011.html https://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2022-August/047266.htm... Here is a nice suggestion on how to get this into Koha: https://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2022-August/047271.htm... Which I was too lazy to do (esp as it's mostly QA work), and instead implemented the aforementiones rewrite hack. But if there were people working on it, I would definitly join! Greetings, domm -- Thomas Klausner domm https://domm.plix.at Just another ( Perl | Postgres | Bicycle | Food | Photo | Vinyl ) Hacker A not-so-short list of things I learned at PerlKohaCon #Perl #Koha [ 2023-08-19 10:00 > https://domm.plix.at/perl/2023_08_things_i_learned_at_perlkohacon.html ] Long and good read: http://bit-player.org/2023/ai-and-the-end-of-programminge 2023-09-14 12:01 > https://domm.plix.at/microblog.html ]