Feels like we're thinking way too hard about this. It might simplify things to look directly at our situation instead of getting too clever. We're at GPL2. Options are: - stay there - move to GPL3 - move to AGPL3 - some other scenarios that I don't think have been proposed by anyone other than as a "we could..."
From what I can tell, moving to GPL3 is not contentious.
From what I can tell, moving to AGPL3 is mostly not contentious but has some strong minority opposition.
So, would a meaningful vote be: - yes/no I approve of moving to GPL3 - yes/no I approve of moving to AGPL3 And we could even set the bar pretty high for acceptance (? 80% approval). This assumes my 'From what I can tells' are correct. The proportional voting schemes seem to make more sense if we're looking for more than one outcome--which we aren't. -- unless we want to have a certain percentage of the code under one license or the another, that would be kind of cool (no, I'm joking here, don't do that). -reed