Hi Marcel, have you looked into going another route and not padding the actual item callnumbers but using a custom filing rule to fill cn_sort with? We use cn_sort in reports regularly with some success - even without a custom filing rule the results are often better than just sorting on the itemcallnumber. If you were using your own classification and filing rules, you could add the padding there, while the callnumbers would still display the same. Katrin On 17.02.20 09:56, Marcel de Rooy wrote:
Hi all, Does anyone of you have experience with zero padding callnumbers in Koha? We have shelves like 1, 10, 100 and 1000. And reports are always problematic since 10 is between 1 and 2, etc. So we want to zero padd to 0001, 0010, 0100 and 1000. Since we will not adjust older hand written labels on books, they will still list 1, 10, 100, etc.
Searching for the older callnumbers will no longer work after renumbering. (Unless we leave the old callnumber in the record too, or make Koha's search a bit wiser somehow.)
If you did something similar, did you encounter other things to take into account?
Thanks, Marcel de Rooy Rijksmuseum Research Library _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha