This blog's article introduces serious confusions about FOSS movement. Table reflects poor study when classifies Linux (and not GNU) as an operating system, while Android is Linux-based too. "Open source" only means consumers can see the design. Nothing more about freedom. Many JavaScript programs can be understood as Open Source while them are proprietary-licensed. "Proprietary software is created and sold by a corporation" -> Same as RedHat Linux, Virtuozzo, QCAD, etc. (all FOSS) "Open source software (OSS) is created by a community of software developers (programmers)" -> Most of OSS and FOSS programs are created by a single person per project. With the 4 enumerated freedoms it tries to simulate equality between OSS and FOSS and "free as in beer". El 18/07/18 a les 19:19, King, Fred ha escrit:
This popped up in a weekly digest of tweets I get from the US National Institutes of Health. It's a couple of years old, but it's a great description of Open Source software-what it is, why it's free, and why you should use it. It might be useful for someone trying to persuade their organization to switch to Koha.
https://communityhealthmaps.nlm.nih.gov/2016/08/05/so-what-is-open-source-ex...
Fred King Medical Librarian, MedStar Washington Hospital Center fred.king@medstar.net<mailto:fred.king@medstar.net> 202-877-6670 ORCID 0000-0001-5266-0279 MedStar Authors Catalog: http://medstarauthors.org
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always gotten there first, and is waiting for it. --Terry Pratchett
_______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha