9 Dec
2013
9 Dec
'13
7:28 p.m.
At 09:06 AM 12/9/2013 -0800, Hernandez, Heather wrote: [snip]
But if we really know exactly what was photographed, then we can do a detailed 533/534 note combination, and even, e.g., a 776 field to link to the record of the item photographed (if possible).
Interesting. 776 or 856? [N.B. I'm not a cataloguer, but from a tech p.o.v. we often use 856, mostly $u and $z, to "link" to a record of the specific biblio. 776 is only used for *alternate|different* formats of the biblio. Maybe I'm mistaken.] Thanks - Paul