On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org> wrote:
In other words, "Could you return to the kind of participation you were doing just a few months ago?"
Yes, before they took on a new client's requests.
And what was it about that new client's requests that made them so different about the clients before them?
You tell me. You were contracted to work on it.
But that's not really the issue, is it? This is about doing a "find/delete" on anything that says "supported by LibLime."
This is about keeping Koha.org as vendor-neutral as possible. Demo links should point to the open-source version of Koha.
Sure it is.
It is amazing that we are having this conversation. I thought everyone had moved on with their lives until you started this thread.
And as it turns out others agree that this is an issue that needs to be corrected.
Hey, the muck has been stirred. Why not chime in?
And for the record, I haven't earned one thin dime off of Koha. Does that make my statements and concerns irrelevant?
It does make it more difficult for you to make accurate statements about what a developer or company should or shouldn't do in order for it to remain sustainable or profitable.
Yes, you're very clear on the librarian's role in all this: "Take what we give you and shut up." Best of luck with your next RFP.