Hi! I agree with everything that has been said about making RFCs more visible and accessible, and have some ideas for how MediaWiki might help us achieve this. I don't think the layout of the RFCs is clear enough as it is, all of these pages seem (at first glance) to be doing some of the same things: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs:for_3.2 http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:3.2 And how do you find out which RFCs have sponsors, which are under active development etc? *** Editing and "cataloguing" RFCs For another project I have used the "Semantic Mediawiki" (http://semantic-mediawiki.org/) family of extensions to MediaWiki, and I think it/they might help with making our RFCs easier to interact with. It would go something like this: 1. Create a template that collects relevant information about RFCs, building on Template:RFC 2. Create a form (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms) that makes filling in the template easy, including lists of allowed values for things like e.g. sponsorship status or development status. 3. Create a number of pages with inline queries (http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Inline_queries), that list RFCs based on given criteria, e.g. - all sponosored RFCs - all RFCs that do not have sponsors - all RFCs that are in active development - etc It is possible to confugure what is shown in these query results, so there could be columns for targeted Koha version etc (Basically all the info that is collected by the template). These pages could also link to the same results as RSS (http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Inline_queries#Exporting_query_resul....), making it relatively easy to monitor e.g. all new, unsponsored RFCs. We could also create categories for different areas of Koha, e.g. cataloguing, aquisitions etc. *** Enhance RFC pages The page for an RFC could perhaps also be enhanced in interesting ways: * Pull in info from the relevant bug on Bugzilla (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Bugzilla_Reports - I havn't used this, but it looks promising) * Pull in info (commits) from public git repos when a branch has been published for the RFC (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RSS) * Provide a "standard" comment form as an alternative to the "Talk" page (http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ArticleComments) If this sounds like something people would be interested in trying out, I'd be happy to spend some time on setting it up. Regards, Magnus libriotech.no