I'm not worked up...! It is just for some institutions that have strict guidelines, not being up front with that information (and the potential use of the results) can be extremely problematic - involving questions of compliance, and also can limit use of the results permanently. It is also, to me, a courtesy thing generally! This is one of those things it is better to be a bit over the top on, and be squeaky clean about!, than otherwise. Getting a bad rap on this sort of question is really hard to fix, too. Being totally OK on this sort of thing means more groups/institutions can participate in Koha... and contribute. I'll be quiet now! Sorry to jump back in on this on, Nick On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:
On 5 August 2014 10:25, Elaine Bradtke <eb@efdss.org> wrote:
Folks, it's a seriously vague survey. . . nothing to get worked up over.
I don't see anyone getting worked up about anything. Some simple questions about what the information is going to be used for. Hardly qualifies as being worked up. I'd still like a public statement about what the information is about. If that counts me as worked up, so be it.
Chris _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha