Hi Heather, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hernandez, Heather <heather_hernandez@nps.gov> wrote:
Hi, Pablo--
I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number.
We wish to have 001 as unique bibliographic control number, but our library have nothing to do with OCLC. Are you saying that you wish Koha could automatically generate a unique
control number in the 001?
Yes.
Would you use this differently from the Koha record number in the 999 $c field?
Yes. In fact we already have a control number on old records because they come from a migration, and this numbers could overlap with biblionumber (999$c). That's why bug 9921 is not useful for us. We need on 001 a unique record number that is not equal neither with OCLC control number nor Koha's biblionumber. Cheers, Pablo