Hi to all, only today I can read the log of IRC meeting at 01/set./2010. The lines about this topic, the unimarc holding field, are here: http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2010-09-01#i_494525 You can see my proposal here: in the last lines of the page. My patch is here: http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-patches/2010-August/012413.ht... This patch in fact transalte the French 995 setup in the English setup so is compatible with the present Unimarc french installations The only real differece is to use $942^0 for popularity. The change is in the file ..etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs I insert the line melm 942$0 popularity:n,popularity:s,item instead of melm 995$s popularity:n,popularity:s,item Why we need a default about holding field ? -- For indexing, the file etc/zebradb/marc_defs/unimarc/biblios/record.abs is only one for every language -- For help new user on migration, we can say them: "use this subfields". -- To have a setup where Koha features (lost/withdrawn, circulation, etc.) are working immediatly Probably english Unimarc setup is not used from a library, but can be use as a standard to start a translation and a localization. I propose to insert this patch in 3.2, for me is very important -- Zeno Tajoli CILEA - Segrate (MI) tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it (Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci qaunto tra AT con @)