I think we've gotten off track here a bit. The original message from Owen called for the links to demos on Koha.org to go to Koha demos - not LEK demos. A request that makes perfect sense. The fact that LEK code may eventually be released to the world, doesn't come into play here. The fact is that links to LEK demos on the Koha.org site are misleading and imply that the code is available to all for download now. I for one was not ignoring what Josh said earlier - I was stating - as others were - that the links to demos on the official Koha.org website should go to the open source, freely available, version of Koha - not a company specific version of Koha that you have to pay in order to get. Nicole On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Ben Ide <benide@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Chris.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu> wrote: From Ben, with snips:
You'll quote someone who spoke with Josh in a telephone conversation, but not Josh's direct response to the list?
Josh is a subscriber to this list and thus is free to correct any mis-quotes of himself. I would encourage him to do so. I do not think for a moment that anyone on this list desires to mis-quote Josh. On the contrary, I think we would all desire most sincerely to very clearly understand Josh and his present course of action.
To what advantage? Why should he send another missive here when all have been content to ignore the previous ones?
http://www.nabble.com/user/UserPosts.jtp?user=97160
Perhaps you could request this of Josh or encourage the individual at your organization who is responsible for your relationship to LL to request it of Josh?
Again, what on earth would be the advantage of that? To me, it just seems like a waste of a busy person's time.
Thanks, -- Ben
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/64560 _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha