Hi, On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:54 PM, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
1. much of the other Koha-related materials are under GPL2+, so we should license the community website under the same terms, so all the explanations and arguments made before still apply and we don't have to think about it too much; OR
Licensing under GPL2+ would be my preference for "permanent" content such as documentation - but see below.
2. we consider that stuff on the community website is advertising that should be spread as widely as possible, so we put it under a really liberal license like No Problem Bugroff, WTFPL, MIT/Expat or anything else compatible with GPL2+ (just in case it ends up in Koha itself).
I'd be happy with a more liberal license such MIT for things like the news and events postings. Can we do both, or would that be too confusing? Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt@gmail.com