Hi Iming Some bugs on Bugzilla deal with this need, felt in some libraries. For instance: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921 Regards, Marcel -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:koha-bounces@lists.katipo.co.nz] Namens Iming Chan Verzonden: donderdag 22 augustus 2013 15:14 Aan: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Onderwerp: [Koha] Data matching during MARC import Dear all, Just wondering whether it is possible to use either 999$c or 999$d (Biblionumber) as record matching mechanism during MARC import? Currently, we are matching MARC records using 001 (Control number). However, every now and then, one of us forgot to manually add the Koha biblionumber to 001 field after saving a new bibliographic record. Therefore, when we import MARC records, matches are not made (i.e. fuller/higher quality records not replace brief ones created as part of the acquisitions process). It will be nice that the biblionumber can automatically added to MARC 001 tag when saving a new record. Until then, we will have to save the record, then edit the same record to manually enter the assigned biblionumber to MARC 001 tag!! Cheers, Iming ----- Iming Chan Translib Information Service Melbourne, Australia -- View this message in context: http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Data-matching-during-MARC-import-tp5765267... Sent from the Koha-general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha