+1 Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile : +919820715876 Website : http://www.anantcorp.com Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:48 PM, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
Liz Rea wrote:
http://koha-community.org/support/paid-support/how-to-get-listed/ [...] Entries will be added if they represent a current proffer of Koha services. Entries that are obviously spam (i.e., not relevant to Koha services) will not be accepted.
From time to time, the Koha webmasters may check vendors to see if they currently offer services. If a company no longer does, their entry may be removed. All removals will be posted publicly to the Koha mailing list. [...] These guidelines were adopted at the 5 May 2010 IRC meeting. Notes from the meeting can be found at http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2010-05-05#i_434509.
Can we add a solidarity clause? Do we want to list support providers who are actively attacking our community through domain names, trademarks and legal actions? That sort of community-splitting tactic should have no place in the project, IMO.
I move that any such providers should be suspended from the listing until they cease legal actions against other providers and offer domains and marks to the community in a FOSS-compatible way.
Furthermore, I suggest that the vendors' site must link back to the community site, else their entry may be removed.
I'm in no hurry about the link back, but the actions, domains and marks requirement seems pretty important.
Comments?
Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster and LMS developer at | software www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha