I like the "it's people -- not companies" scheme myself.
Obviously I disagree in at least some limited form.
However if people form the anti-PTFS side are unwilling to compromise, I see only two options: 1) Two Kohas with the same name that will only more confuse people and make the issues David Lang mentioned much worse and more wide spread, or 2) The anti-PTFS people finishing the fork of the product and coming up with a new name for there version.
Ed, the obvious option you missed was this one... 3) The *PTFS* people finishing the fork of their product and coming up with a new name for their version. :) well... thats already been done!!! its called LEK :) seriously tho, why would we (read: everyone else in the greater-international-Koha-community) want to abandon our project's name (10 years folks!) because one 'stubbon' company forced us to change our website from A -> B the Koha project continues regardless of what PTFS decides to do in the future and in other news... congrats to software-coop and bywater! http://liswire.com/content/bywater-solutions-and-softwarecoop-collaborating-... way to collaborate Guys! cheers, Mason -- KohaAloha, NZ