Magnus Enger <magnus@enger.priv.no>
But I still think it would be a good idea to specify that this Cataloguing-category is for Cataloguing RFCs... Any thoughts on that?
I think it would be a bad idea. Such an RFC should be in both the Cataloguing category and the RFC category, which should let browsers identify that it is a Cataloguing RFC. On a related point, it pains me to see that there are inconsistently-named categories for RFCs for 3.2 and 3.4 but I haven't seen a way to fix that before I get time to visit each RFC and change the categories. I think they should be in 3.4 and RFC categories, or 3.2 and RFC categories, as appropriate, if we can search for things in the intersection of two categories, which I also haven't seen a way to do yet. Are these changes and category-based searches possible? Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha