[Koha] RFC Discussion

[MJ Ray]

Magnus Enger <magnus at enger.priv.no>
> But I still think it would be a good idea to specify that this
> Cataloguing-category is for Cataloguing RFCs... Any thoughts on that?

I think it would be a bad idea.  Such an RFC should be in both the
Cataloguing category and the RFC category, which should let browsers
identify that it is a Cataloguing RFC.

On a related point, it pains me to see that there are
inconsistently-named categories for RFCs for 3.2 and 3.4 but I haven't
seen a way to fix that before I get time to visit each RFC and change
the categories.  I think they should be in 3.4 and RFC categories, or
3.2 and RFC categories, as appropriate, if we can search for things
in the intersection of two categories, which I also haven't seen a
way to do yet.

Are these changes and category-based searches possible?

Hope that explains,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op.
Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster.
In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha