Once an RFC has been turned into a feature (as in the development has been done), does the RFC get taken off the wiki?<div><br></div><div>Lori<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:41 AM, MJ Ray <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mjr@phonecoop.coop">mjr@phonecoop.coop</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">Magnus Enger <<a href="mailto:magnus@enger.priv.no">magnus@enger.priv.no</a>> wrote:<br>
> I don't think the layout of the RFCs is clear enough as it is, all of<br>
> these pages seem (at first glance) to be doing some of the same<br>
> things:<br>
> <a href="http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs" target="_blank">http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs</a><br>
> <a href="http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs:for_3.2" target="_blank">http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs:for_3.2</a><br>
> <a href="http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:3.2" target="_blank">http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:3.2</a><br>
<br>
</div>I agree with this and posted something similar myself about<br>
Category:Serials and Category:RFCs compared to the proposed<br>
Category:Serials_RFCs.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> And how do you find out which RFCs have sponsors, which are under<br>
> active development etc?<br>
<br>
</div>Search bugzilla enh tickets. But, as noted, bugzilla needs some<br>
tidying.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> *** Editing and "cataloguing" RFCs<br>
><br>
> For another project I have used the "Semantic Mediawiki"<br>
> (<a href="http://semantic-mediawiki.org/" target="_blank">http://semantic-mediawiki.org/</a>) family of extensions to MediaWiki,<br>
> and I think it/they might help with making our RFCs easier to interact<br>
> with.<br>
<br>
</div>I'm reluctant to see our wiki become even more stuck in mediawikisms.<br>
I remain hopeful that dissatisfaction with mediawiki and a return to<br>
something which uses an easier wiki markup will happen one day.<br>
<br>
So, is this possible another way?<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<div class="im">> * Provide a "standard" comment form as an alternative to the "Talk"<br>
> page (<a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ArticleComments" target="_blank">http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ArticleComments</a>)<br>
<br>
</div>That reminds me: if I'm watching an RFC page, will I be told about<br>
activity on the related Talk page? If not, wouldn't it be better<br>
if people just edited the RFC and we switched off Talk pages?<br>
<br>
Hope that helps,<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
MJ Ray (slef), member of <a href="http://www.software.coop" target="_blank">www.software.coop</a>, a for-more-than-profit co-op.<br>
Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster.<br>
In My Opinion Only: see <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html" target="_blank">http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html</a><br>
Available for hire for Koha work <a href="http://www.software.coop/products/koha" target="_blank">http://www.software.coop/products/koha</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Koha mailing list <a href="http://koha-community.org" target="_blank">http://koha-community.org</a><br>
<a href="mailto:Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz">Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha" target="_blank">http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>