+1<br><br clear="all">Regards,<br>Koustubha Kale<br>Anant Corporation<br><br>Contact Details :<br>Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w),<br> Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601.<br>
TeleFax : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109<br>Mobile : +919820715876<br>Website : <a href="http://www.anantcorp.com">http://www.anantcorp.com</a><br>Blog : <a href="http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2">http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:48 PM, MJ Ray <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mjr@phonecoop.coop">mjr@phonecoop.coop</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Liz Rea wrote:<br>
> <a href="http://koha-community.org/support/paid-support/how-to-get-listed/" target="_blank">http://koha-community.org/support/paid-support/how-to-get-listed/</a><br>
[...]<br>
> Entries will be added if they represent a current proffer of Koha<br>
> services. Entries that are obviously spam (i.e., not relevant to<br>
> Koha services) will not be accepted.<br>
><br>
> From time to time, the Koha webmasters may check vendors to see if<br>
> they currently offer services. If a company no longer does, their<br>
> entry may be removed. All removals will be posted publicly to the<br>
> Koha mailing list.<br>
[...]<br>
> These guidelines were adopted at the 5 May 2010 IRC meeting. Notes<br>
> from the meeting can be found at<br>
> <a href="http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2010-05-05#i_434509" target="_blank">http://stats.workbuffer.org/irclog/koha/2010-05-05#i_434509</a>.<br>
<br>
Can we add a solidarity clause? Do we want to list support providers<br>
who are actively attacking our community through domain names,<br>
trademarks and legal actions? That sort of community-splitting tactic<br>
should have no place in the project, IMO.<br>
<br>
I move that any such providers should be suspended from the listing<br>
until they cease legal actions against other providers and offer<br>
domains and marks to the community in a FOSS-compatible way.<br>
<br>
Furthermore, I suggest that the vendors' site must link back to<br>
the community site, else their entry may be removed.<br>
<br>
I'm in no hurry about the link back, but the actions, domains and marks<br>
requirement seems pretty important.<br>
<br>
Comments?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster and LMS developer at | software<br>
<a href="http://www.software.coop" target="_blank">www.software.coop</a> <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk" target="_blank">http://mjr.towers.org.uk</a> | .... co<br>
IMO only: see <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html" target="_blank">http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html</a> | .... op<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Koha mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz">Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha" target="_blank">http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha</a><br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>