<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Kyle Hall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kyle.m.hall@gmail.com">kyle.m.hall@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I think the one question is enough. I for one plan to keep myself out<br>
of the kitchen. There are plenty of chefs there already.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Kyle has hit the nail on the head here: Too many cooks spoil the soup.<br><br>Is there no one we can trust to provide us with some small direction here?<br><br>Given the opportunity, each person who votes might present a different opinion. That is chaos.<br>
<br>There are some fine examples in history of small appointed bodies producing governmental documents that the "masses" were able to lay hold of and support in spite of their various and varied differences.<br>
<br>We have vested Nicole with this appointment. She has, in turn sought some consultation as she saw best in her judgment (which judgment we decided to trust when we vested her with that appointment.) Second guessing it now is effectively failing to back up the appointment we made. This has surely got to be a source of great discouragement to her and a hindrance to getting the job done.<br>
<br>It is clear that she is very conscious of the opinions and concerns expressed in recent days. Doubtless these have been taken into consideration.<br><br>I would humbly suggest that we now just let Nicole do the job we requested of her by appointing her to this task.<br>
<br>Respectfully submitted with a smile and a light heart,<br><br>Chris<br>