Ian said: I'm going to give up trying to understand LibLime. I wanted so much
for this whole thing to just be a misunderstanding, a difference in
viewpoints that could be cleared up by communication. But falsely
taking credit for someone else's work like this ruins any chance for
sympathy. That's not acceptable behavior by any standards.<br><br>And
to that I add: How is it there is "no vendor lock-in" with Liblime's
Express or LEK versions??? Another misleading claim on their <a href="http://www.liblime.com/products/koha/koha-solution-comparison" target="_blank">http://www.liblime.com/products/koha/koha-solution-comparison</a> page, I believe.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>Lori</font><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Walls, Ian <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Ian.Walls@med.nyu.edu">Ian.Walls@med.nyu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
>To me, that theory just doesn't make sense. If it were true, why is it<br>
>LEK, and not just Koha. Why would they be offering 'Community Koha' if<br>
>LEK *is* 'Koha Community' ( assuming the theory were true ).<br>
<br>
>I was poking around the Liblime site and came across this page:<br>
><a href="http://www.liblime.com/products/koha/koha-solution-comparison" target="_blank">http://www.liblime.com/products/koha/koha-solution-comparison</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>Ah, yes, I'd forgotten about this page, where they clearly differentiate themselves from the Koha community.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
>I am a bit upset because they are listing "Off-line circulation" as a<br>
>LEK only feature. So not only is this false information, but they are<br>
>taking credit for my own personal work ( it's listed under "LibLime<br>
>Enhancements" ).<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>I'm going to give up trying to understand LibLime. I wanted so much for this whole thing to just be a misunderstanding, a difference in viewpoints that could be cleared up by communication. But falsely taking credit for someone else's work like this ruins any chance for sympathy. That's not acceptable behavior by any standards.<br>
<br>
Moving on (better late than never),<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
-Ian<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------<br>
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by return email and delete the original message. Please note, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The organization accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.<br>
=================================<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Koha mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz">Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha" target="_blank">http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>