<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">This is indeed true, but some times there are some of us that revel in the intricacies of the machine and also are willing to trade time for lack of downtime!<BR>
<BR>
both positions have validity<BR>
<BR>
Ed Sharpe archivist for SMECC<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj: <B>Re: [Koha] Multiple KOHA - One Server - smecc viewpoint </B><BR>
Date: 8/27/2003 3:59:12 PM US Mountain Standard Time<BR>
From: <A HREF="mailto:markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk">markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk</A><BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:koha@lists.katipo.co.nz">koha@lists.katipo.co.nz</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 2003-08-27 23:45:08 +0100 COURYHOUSE@aol.com wrote:<BR>
> To: <A HREF="mailto:chris@katipo.co.nz">chris@katipo.co.nz</A><BR>
<BR>
Pardon?<BR>
<BR>
>Just a thought, running on three separate servers also spreads the work <BR>
>across three processors [...]<BR>
<BR>
It also means that you either need to do three times the sysadmin work, or get a sysadmin who can do network-based admin, which pushes other costs up.<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.<BR>
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@jabber.at<BR>
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Koha mailing list<BR>
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz<BR>
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>