[Koha] Authorities lost during upgrade to 3.6.1

[Paul]

At 06:26 PM 1/5/2012 +1300, Mason James wrote:
>On 2012-01-5, at 1:56 PM, Chris Cormack wrote:
[snip]
>its skipping *all* records after. looks like you have a bad bib record
> >>  I'm guessing it aborted the process, as a quick look shows that none 
> of the
> >> "missing" authorities have magically re-appeared.
> >>
> > How about trying it without the -b, just -a to reindex authorities. Id
> > add -v for verbose too
>
>yes indeed - there was an small bug with rebuild_zebra.pl script when 
>indexing both bibs and auth records using the xml switch (not sure if its 
>fixed yet?)
>
>for best results, use the -x (for xml option) on authority records alone, 
>like this...
>
>$ ./bin/migration_tools/rebuild_zebra.pl -a -r -v -x

Thank you both very much.  In fact the -a is incompatible with -x, but 
using -a -r -v, :

09:56:26-05/01 zebraidx(2947) [log] Iterations: isam/dict 885740/153588
09:56:26-05/01 zebraidx(2947) [log] Dict: inserts/updates/deletions: 153588/0/0
09:56:27-05/01 zebraidx(2947) [log] Records: 10398 i/u/d 10398/0/0

so the authorities are now (I *think* properly and completely) 
indexed.  However, for the biblios, using only -b -r -v, the indexing 
failed after 12,835 records:

09:58:45-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [warn] MARC: Bad offsets in data. Skipping rest
09:58:45-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [warn] Record didn't contain match fields in 
(bib1,Local-number)
09:58:45-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [log] error grs.marcxml.record 
/tmp/5H7Hpo5SlB/biblio/exported_records 8741259
09:58:51-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [log] Iterations: isam/dict 12930648/373712
09:58:51-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [log] Dict: inserts/updates/deletions: 373712/0/0
09:58:57-05/01 zebraidx(3048) [log] Records: 12835 i/u/d 12835/0/0

yet using -x it re-indexed all 14,899 biblios

10:00:49-05/01 zebraidx(4857) [log] Iterations: isam/dict 16437721/481418
10:00:49-05/01 zebraidx(4857) [log] Dict: inserts/updates/deletions: 481418/0/0
10:00:55-05/01 zebraidx(4857) [log] Records: 14899 i/u/d 14899/0/0

QUESTION:  Does this warning "Record didn't contain match fields in 
(bib1,Local-number)" have a specific cause that has been seen before?  And 
is there a way in staff-client to find the record matching (presumably 
biblio #, but I can't find it even in "advanced search) 12,836?  [Or is it 
easier to work directly from the mysql?]

Again, many thanks - Paul