[Koha] Subject: Re: RFI/RFP for FOSS -Librarians and Service Providers

Tue Jun 14 09:26:42 NZST 2011

I responded to Lee offline quite awhile ago, but since posts from
non-consultants were asked for, here is how we handled the RFP for NEKLS.
After a prior experience contracting with a vendor who refused to deal with
an RFP, it is our policy to never select an ILS vendor without an RFP. Most
recently we used an RFP in selecting a new Koha support vendor with good
response. We did not attempt to separate price from non-price proposals, and
in fact used a preliminary evaluation matrix with a 20%/80% ratio for price
and non-price factors. Although it was certainly not the only factor, cost
was an integral part of our decision making, but we did not select the
lowest priced proposal.

Jim Minges

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:57:07 +1200
From: Paul Nielsen <pauln at hauraki-dc.govt.nz>
Subject: Re: [Koha] RFI/RFP for FOSS -Librarians and Service Providers
To: Lee Phillips <lphillips at buttepubliclibrary.info>
Cc: "koha at lists.katipo.co.nz" <koha at lists.katipo.co.nz>
Message-ID:
       <B92D76D471268041BACAF827AC6564BD01EFD31D8E at ginger.hauraki-dc.govt.nz
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Lee,

I only just noticed this thread now, so hopefully I am not too late for you.
We used a pretty standard 2 envelope (Price/non-price) RFP process that we
sent to a pre-selected list of vendors, including two Koha support
companies.
We short-listed after non-price evaluation and then opened the $ envelopes
after a round of further evaluation/testing/demos and site visits etc. We
selected Koha & Catalyst so can I infer that it must work for OS products
and providers?

I've attached our RFP for you to review - it is quite brief as we wanted to
keep it as simple as possible.

Regards,

Paul Nielsen  |  Library Manager
ddi: (07) 862 5064  |  email: pauln at hauraki-dc.govt.nz

Hauraki District Council  |  William Street Paeroa 3600  |  PO Box 17 Paeroa
3640  |  NZ
ph: (07) 862 8609 or 0800 734 834 (from within district)  |  fax: (07) 862
8607
web: www.hauraki-dc.govt.nz<http://www.hauraki-dc.govt.nz>  |  email:
info at hauraki-dc.govt.nz<
>
> mailto:info at hauraki-dc.govt.nz>  |  HDC Libraries<
> http://library.hauraki-dc.govt.nz>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this email
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: koha-bounces at lists.katipo.co.nz [mailto:
> koha-bounces at lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Lori Bowen Ayre
> Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 12:43 p.m.
> To: Lee Phillips
> Cc: koha at lists.katipo.co.nz
> Subject: Re: [Koha] RFI/RFP for FOSS -Librarians and Service Providers
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> I was hoping someone who isn't a consultant would chime in on this thread
> but since they didn't, I'll share my approach to this issue.  I generally
> recommend that libraries evaluate the products' functionality separate from
> the pricing.  You can determine the functional capabilities of the
> proprietary products by issuing an RFP or an RFI or maybe even a
> questionnaire but that won't necessarily work for the open source products
> since there is no single sales and marketing department for Evergreen or
> Koha and responding to those RFPs is just too onerous.
>
> But you can get the information yourself.  Sometimes what I've done is help
> the library with the process of identifying their needs and then doing most
> of the evaluation of the OS products themselves. The goal is to end up with
> a matrix of how each product matches up to the libraries need.  The matrix
> is basically filled out by the libraries themselves based on  tehir own
> testing of the open source product and by working with sales people from the
> proprietary vendors.
>
> Once you've evaluated the products and know which ones will meet your needs
> functionly, then you issue an RFQ.  You are MUCH more likely to get
> responses (from migration and support companies that service Koha and
> Evergreen) to an RFQ than you are to an RFP that is boilerplate and designed
> for proprietary systems and which ultimately makes the OS options look bad
> because some key questions aren't even asked.
>
> But some of those key questions SHOULD be asked in the RFQ  (e.g. cost of
> migration of data to get started...and what about when you decide to leave
> that vendor?, software license and maintenance cost of each module of
> software and SIP server, hardware requirements, etc).
>
> I hope this helps.  Would love to hear what you've come up with if this
> message comes too late to be of use!
>
> Lori
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Lori Bowen Ayre // Library Technology Consultant
> The Galecia Group // www.galecia.com<http://www.galecia.com/>
> (707) 763-6869 // Lori.Ayre at galecia.com<mailto:Lori.Ayre at galecia.com>
>
> <mailto:Lori.Ayre at galecia.com>Specializing in open source ILS solutions,
> RFID, filtering,
> workflow optimization, and materials handling
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Lee Phillips <
> lphillips at buttepubliclibrary.info<mailto:lphillips at buttepubliclibrary.info>>
> wrote:
> Hello all from Montana,
> We have been having the craziest weather here and in the US in general.
> It is has been the longest winter for us that I can remember.
> Anyway, I am working on a white paper about equitable RFP and RFI
> (request for proposals or request for information) that are vendor
> neutral and gives FOSS library ware equal footing in the bidding
> process. In addition I have been contacted by the Montana Library
> Consortium (who currently uses Sirisi) to consult on their RFI for the
> shared catalog ILS for the same reason. Many of you who were at KohaCon
> 9 in TX. will remember the Montana State Library representative who
> attended(Mike Price) and he was less than kind in his reporting back to
> the state library.
> I have found RFP templates that I am currently modifying to create a
> format that is unbiased for FOSS and proprietary products.
> SO....if you have recently gone out for an RFP for your ILS and have
> information that I can incorporate into this white paper (and pass on
> the the Montana Shared Catalog) I would be grateful. Of course time is
> of the essence, so please send me what you have or point me to info that
> would be important to consider.
> Thank you for your time, as always it is a privilege and a pleasure to
> be part of the Koha Community.
> Sincerely
> Lee Phillips
> Director
> Butte Silver Bow Public Library
> Butte, Montana
> _______________________________________________
> Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz<mailto:Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz>
> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

"NEKLS and its member libraries are leaders and innovators in providing
exemplary library services."

Jim Minges, Director
Northeast Kansas Library System
4317 West 6th Street
Lawrence, KS  66049
Phone: 785-838-4090      FAX: 785-838-3989
jminges at nekls.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.katipo.co.nz/pipermail/koha/attachments/20110613/dde28dcf/attachment.htm 